Current:Home > StocksOptions Trading Strategies: Classification by Strike Prices - Insights by Bertram Charlton -MarketPoint
Options Trading Strategies: Classification by Strike Prices - Insights by Bertram Charlton
Charles H. Sloan View
Date:2025-04-09 03:44:28
Options by strike price classification
When comparing the strike price to the current stock price, there are two scenarios: higher than the current stock price (Covered) and lower than the current stock price (Naked). So, options with different strike prices can be classified into 8 types:
Long Covered Call
Buying a call option with a strike price > stock price.
Long Naked Call
Buying a call option with a strike price < stock price.
Sell Covered Call
Selling a call option with a strike price > stock price.
Sell Naked Call
Selling a call option with a strike price < stock price.
Long Covered Put
Buying a put option with a strike price > stock price.
Long Naked Put
Buying a put option with a strike price < stock price.
Sell Covered Put
Selling a put option with a strike price > stock price.
Sell Naked Put
Selling a put option with a strike price < stock price.
The reason for this classification is that the significance behind whether the strike price is higher (Covered) or lower (Naked) than the stock price is very different.
Long Naked Call
Let’s take Long Naked Call (buying a call option with a strike price < stock price) as an example. I believe Long Naked Call is essentially like adding extra leverage to buying a stock.
For example, let’s say a stock is priced at $100, and you buy a call option with a strike price of $50. Since the strike price is $50 and the stock price is $100, the strike price < stock price, making this a Long Naked Call. Because the option’s strike price is $50 less than the stock price, the premium for this option won’t be cheap; it will definitely be above $50. If the premium were less than $50, your cost to exercise (strike price + premium) would be less than the stock price, which wouldn’t make sense for the counterparty. For someone to be willing to trade with you, the premium must be higher than $50.
Let’s assume the premium is $60. So, the cost to buy this option is $60. In this case:
If the stock rises 50% to $150, your profit is $40, and the return is 40/60 = +67%.
If the stock drops 50% to $50, your loss is $60, and the return is -60/60 = -100%.
Now, if you bought the stock instead of the option:
If the stock rises 50% to $150, your profit is $50, and the return is 50/100 = +50%.
If the stock drops 50% to $50, your loss is $50, and the return is -50/100 = -50%.
As you can see, compared to directly buying the stock, your return with the option is almost like having double leverage. But it’s not exactly double leverage because the premium has a time value, which means you paid an extra cost.
Long Covered Call
The significance behind a Long Covered Call is quite different.
For example, if a stock is priced at $100, and you buy a call option with a strike price of $110, this is a Long Covered Call because the strike price > stock price. The premium for this option won’t be as high as in the previous example. Let’s assume it’s $10.
So, if you buy this option for $10:
If the stock rises 50% to $150, because the strike price + premium will be greater than the stock price and the strike price is fixed at $110, the premium will rise to at least $40. The return is (150-110-10)/10 = +300%.
If the stock rises 20% to $120, your return is (120-110-10)/10 = 0%.
If the stock rises 10% to $110, your return is (110-110-10)/10 = -100%.
In fact, since your strike price is $110, unless the stock rises more than 10%, your return is -100%.
As you can see, the leverage effect of a Long Covered Call is very different from that of a Long Naked Call.
veryGood! (743)
Related
- Trump's 'stop
- Tucson man gets 16-month prison term for threatening a mass shooting at the University of Arizona
- Judge dismisses federal lawsuit over West Virginia prison and jail conditions
- Average rate on a 30-year mortgage climbs for the first time since late May to just under 7%
- Highlights from Trump’s interview with Time magazine
- Cheez-It partners with Hidden Valley Ranch to create new zesty, cheesy snack
- Judge dismisses federal lawsuit over West Virginia prison and jail conditions
- The best concerts of 2024 so far: AP’s picks include Olivia Rodrigo, Bad Bunny, George Strait, SZA
- Opinion: Gianni Infantino, FIFA sell souls and 2034 World Cup for Saudi Arabia's billions
- Beyoncé's Mom Tina Knowles Defends Blue Ivy From Green Eyed Monsters
Ranking
- California DMV apologizes for license plate that some say mocks Oct. 7 attack on Israel
- Why mass shootings and violence increase in the summer
- Ex-astronaut who died in Washington plane crash was doing a flyby near a friend’s home, NTSB says
- Tesla sales fall for second straight quarter despite price cuts, but decline not as bad as expected
- Have Dry, Sensitive Skin? You Need To Add These Gentle Skincare Products to Your Routine
- LeBron James agrees to a 2-year extension with the Los Angeles Lakers, AP source says
- 'Beetlejuice Beetlejuice' to open Venice Film Festival
- At 17 years old, he was paralyzed from the waist down. 3 years later, he competed in a marathon.
Recommendation
Former Syrian official arrested in California who oversaw prison charged with torture
Some Mississippi legislative districts dilute Black voting power and must be redrawn, judges say
Worsening floods and deterioration pose threats to US dam safety
Jenna Bush Hager Says Her Son Hal, 4, Makes Fun of Her Big Nipples
Highlights from Trump’s interview with Time magazine
Patients on these antidepressants were more likely to gain weight, study says
Man admits kidnapping Michigan store manager in scheme to steal 123 guns
How a ‘once in a century’ broadband investment plan could go wrong